well it's just a history
In the 18th century, the most ancient known
Indo-European languages were those of the ancient
Indo-Iranians. The word
Aryan was therefore adopted to refer not only to the Indo-Iranian peoples, but also to native Indo-European speakers as a whole, including the
Romans,
Greeks, and the
Germans. It was soon recognised that
Balts,
Celts, and
Slavs also belonged to the same group. It was argued that all of these languages originated from a common root—now known as
Proto-Indo-European—spoken by an ancient people who were thought of as ancestors of the
European,
Iranian, and
Indo-Aryan peoples. The ethnic group composed of the
Proto-Indo-Europeans and their modern descendants was termed the "
Aryans".
This usage was common among knowledgeable authors writing in the late 19th and early 20th century. An example of this usage appears in
The Outline of History, a bestselling 1920 work by
H. G. Wells.
[5] In that influential volume, Wells used the term in the plural ("the Aryan peoples"), but he was a staunch opponent of the racist and politically motivated exploitation of the singular term ("the Aryan people") by earlier authors like
Houston Stewart Chamberlain (see below) and was careful either to avoid the generic singular, though he did refer now and again in the singular to some specific "Aryan people" (e.g., the
Scythians). In 1922, in
A Short History of the World, Wells depicted a highly diverse group of various "Aryan peoples" learning "methods of civilization" and then, by means of different uncoordinated movements that Wells believed were part of a larger dialectical rhythm of conflict between settled civilizations and nomadic invaders that also encompassed Aegean and Mongol peoples
inter alia, "subjugat[ing]"—"in form" but not in "ideas and methods"—"the whole ancient world, Semitic, Aegean and Egyptian alike".
[6]
However, in a climate of burgeoning racism it proved difficult to maintain such nuanced distinctions. Even
Max Mueller, a linguist who wrote in 1888 that "an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar,"
[7] was on occasion guilty of using the term "Aryan race."
[8] So it was that despite the injunctions of writers like Wells, the notion of an Aryan race took root in mainstream culture.
Today the use of "Aryan" as a synonym for "Indo-European" or to a lesser extent for "Indo-Iranian" both in academia and in popular culture is obsolete, ideologically suspect, and
politically incorrect. But the term may still occasionally appear in material that is based on older scholarship or written by persons accustomed to older usage. Thus in a 1989 article in
Scientific American,
Colin Renfrew uses the term "Aryan" as a synonym for "Indo-European".
[11]
We also have a few of the extra 우리카지노 modern type like Starburst or Fluffy Favourites
ReplyDelete